 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLUB CHAMPIONSHIP TEAMS QUALIFYING - MATCH 3
Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -140
| Teams | Score | Imps | ||||||||
| North-South | East-West | Contract | Lead | Tricks | NS | EW | NS | EW | ||
| 1 WEERASINGHE | 15 YAP GILES | 1NT N | 5S | 8 | 120 | 7 | -7 | |||
| 11 COX | 5 JONES | 1NT W | 7H | 10 | 180 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 12 SWANSON | 8 PIDDINGTON | 2 W | AS | 9 | 110 | 3 | -3 | |||
| 6 REID | 10 MCPAUL | 2 E | QC | 10 | 130 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 7 PISKO | 2 HOLBROOK | 2 E | 3C | 9 | 110 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 14 BURKE | 4 HAHN | 1NT E | 6S | 8 | 120 | 2 | -2 | |||
| 13 BORRELL | 9 JENNINGS | 2 E | AS | 8 | 90 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 3 WEATHERED | 16 STENT | 2 E | 5H | 9 | 110 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 16 STENT | 3 WEATHERED | 1NT W | 3S | 8 | 120 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 9 JENNINGS | 13 BORRELL | 2 E | AS | 9 | 110 | -1 | 1 | |||
| 2 HOLBROOK | 7 PISKO | 1NT W | TS | 10 | 180 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 4 HAHN | 14 BURKE | 2 S | 4C | 6 | 200 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 10 MCPAUL | 6 REID | 2 S | 5C | 6 | 200 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 5 JONES | 11 COX | 2 S | 2H | 5 | 300 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 8 PIDDINGTON | 12 SWANSON | 1NT N | 8D | 5 | 200 | -3 | 3 | |||
| 15 YAP GILES | 1 WEERASINGHE | 1NT E | TS | 9 | 150 | -7 | 7 | |||
Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Replay with Bridge Solver| FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26 | |||
| Contract | Result | Score | Frequency |
| 1NT by NS | +1 | 120 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | = | -90 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -110 | 3 |
| 2 by EW | +1 | -110 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | +1 | -120 | 1 |
| 2 by EW | +2 | -130 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | +2 | -150 | 1 |
| 1NT by EW | +3 | -180 | 2 |
| 2 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
| 1NT by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -2 | -200 | 1 |
| 2 by NS | -3 | -300 | 1 |